Archives for posts with tag: UK

“Two countries separated by a common language.” This well-known phrase, attributed to quite a few people, is not really an issue, at least to this writer, who has spent a few years writing business content for the UK and US markets.

A few key points will serve you well when it comes to writing for other markets who speak a version of English. Firstly, you should decide whether you are going to maintain two discrete versions of your content: two different websites, two youtube channels, two versions of collateral for each piece of content, and so on. I’ve worked for some companies that kept two versions, and other companies who simply decided which was their main market and wrote one version of everything which favoured that market. A third way is to settle on a ‘MidAtlantic’ version which takes from both, as long as it does so consistently. It depends on the relative importance of the markets and how ‘precious’ your audiences are about content which they feel is commoditised and does not put them first.

Secondly, formats. As is often the case with formats and measurements, the US and UK have gone down different directions with their formats. UK A4 is 297mm by 210mm, whereas US Letter is 11 inches by 8 1/2 inches. This makes US letter a bit shorter and fatter than its UK counterpart. I didn’t realise this until I was doing my MBA in the US and printed off copies of my resume for the MBA office files and they wouldn’t fit properly in the filing cabinets. This is also true of digital versions of all your content. So if you live by downloadable pdf documents, then you need to make a call on format size, or else incur the ire of those people who try and print them, only to find they don’t fit so good.

Thirdly, and perhaps most obviously, spelling and vocabulary vary between the two tongues. I won’t go into exhaustive detail here, but I’m sure you’re aware that in the US the ‘favoured’ from the second paragraph of this post would be minus the ‘u’. Also, the US tend to go in for a lot of ‘ization’, so the realization should set in early that you need to watch this area too. Then there are the much more nuanced differences. For example, one would tend to write ‘despatch’ in the UK, but ‘dispatch’ in the US, ‘programme’ in the UK and ‘program’ in the US. Vocabulary is more standardised for business, with us following the US lead, but common or garden situations can still trip you up, with hood vs bonnet, trunk vs boot, retainer vs braces, suspenders vs braces and garter vs suspenders, to use some examples from cars – Americans, read automobiles! – and personal appearance.

Fourthly, phrasing. This is the area that can catch you out if even if you have good familiarity with what I’ve included so far. This is the kind of knowledge you pick up over time, by making mistakes, or by osmosis, or by sensibly looking for feedback from your US colleagues on your drafts – and even we in the UK write drafts over draughts these days. In the US, one would probably say ‘when are you going to write me?’, eschewing the preposition beloved of the folks across the water. Furthermore, if you wrote ‘our software has built-in intelligence’ in the UK, a US audience would expect to write and read ‘our software has in-built intelligence.’ Finally on this, the US audience has a slightly more relaxed acquaintance with adverbs, so at the end of paragraph three a UK person would write ‘so well’ over ‘so good’, wheres a US person might consider themselves ‘real smart’ rather than ‘really smart’.

You can’t really do justice to a subject so vast in one post, especially since I’ve not even mentioned writing styles and we’ve barely scratched the surface of the other areas, so perhaps we’ll return to this another time.

That’s my view, period, I mean full stop, oh never mind…

To most Europeans, almost all Americans and a good number of Brits, the differences between Great Britain and the United Kingdom can be a little confusing. The origins of the differences are pretty opaque too.

When you throw in the sporting paradigm, things continue to blur the situation. For example, Ireland – technically speaking The Republic of Ireland – and Northern Ireland are separate countries but unite as one geographical island of Ireland for Rugby Union. England, Scotland and Wales compete in many sports as a separate nations, but then come together as ‘Team GB’ for athletics and to compete in the Olympic, World, European and Commonwealth championship events.

I always think it’s a tad odd seeing winning athletes with a Union Jack flag draped round them, since it’s not the flag of the country they’re from, especially since they’re running for another ‘entity’ called Great Britain. And what is it to be British anyway? The Scots and Welsh don’t like being lumped into the ‘Brit’ melting pot, whereas the English seem to mind less, which probably has something to do with their overwhelming population and about a millennium of history.

Being English and belonging to Britain is different to being in a state like Kansas and belonging to a federation like the US, and different again to belonging to a regional entity like the European Union. Confused yet?

According to my passport I’m a citizen of The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but I don’t know what it is to be British. I usually say I’m from England originally, which I find the most accurate. It’s probably best not to go into the politics of nationality, because that’s not the purpose of this post. What is the purpose of this post is this brilliant, witty account in a shade over 5 minutes of what the differences are between England, Great Britain and the United Kingdom by CPG Grey. You also get some bonus info on stuff like British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies. It’s a real education; enjoy.