One of the easiest – and most overlooked – rules of sales is this.

You have a satisfied customer, a delighted customer even, who’s seeing the returns or rewards from the product or service you have relatively recently delivered.

Ask them for 3 referrals. ‘What 3 people can you think of that would also benefit from this product or service, whom we could approach with your blessing?’

Easy. Nothing wrong with asking them to do a bit of work drumming up 3 names for you, that sort of thing is the hallmark of any great partnership. Of course they should be 3 people that don’t compete with your customer.

Think about this for a moment: If you had 2 or 3 personal recommendations from every satisfied customer, you might never need to do demand generation again…

 

I wrote recently, dear reader, on the voice of the customer and its importance for case studies.

I’d like to add to that post here, and improve on it somewhat, I think. When we talk about case studies in the wider context of customer advocacy, we distinguish between the shorter testimonials and larger format case studies. They have slightly different objectives and slightly different audiences – both organisationally and individually – and for that reason they are subject to slightly different best practices.

The testimonial is shorter, punchier, a bit more ‘gushing’ and works best in the voice of the customer – the first person singular or plural – as much as possible. It’s intended for earlier in the buying cycle where evaluators are researching alternative solutions – and solution providers – to their problem.

The ‘proper’ case study is longer, requires more narrative delineating the measured results or outcomes, and works better with a combination of third person accounts and amplifying quotes from the featured customer. You need more reason, more argument and more explanation in it. This kind of document is for further along in the buying cycle where influencers and buyers are getting into the nitty gritty and are seriously judging what you can do for them in their situation.

I should have made that important distinction in my previous post. Silly not to. Perhaps this post, then, should be entitled Moron on the Voice of the Customer instead :-).

 

 

Working with big companies is not like working with small companies. The reasons are obvious of course, and it’s probably why large organisations try – and often fail – to engender a fast-moving and entrepreneurial culture.

Big companies have deeper pockets, so the rewards are bigger, but you also need to factor in the risks, the processes, the number of people involved in working with you, because they’re all deeper as well.

It simply takes longer to get things done.

A few years ago I worked in the tech security space, getting case studies written up with customers. The smaller the customer, the quicker the sign-off, the easier the process. It’s a joy working for smaller companies that can take decisions quickly. The downside is that their ‘logo’ carries less weight than a ‘battleship’ blue chip that takes you what seems like an eternity to turn around.

Make sure you have a good balance of small, medium and large sales opportunities in your sales pipeline. The big deals are great when they come in, but you can’t afford to have your hopper full of big slow-moving deals that can easily get stuck and leave you flapping in the breeze. If you can make your number from the small and medium deals, then the big one, when it comes in, is a rather large layer of icing on your cake.

I wrote recently about asking for the order. It’s a pretty fundamental part of selling, and the good sales people delight in it, whereas the less good dread it.

The key to asking this question at the right time is this: is your customer ready to buy? They will never commit to the sale until they’re ready to buy. Some sales people ask for the order too early, get frustrated and tick off their prospect. Some ask too late, and go hungry.

Just as you follow a sales process, so your customer follows a buying process. Your sales process should be aligned to your customers’ buying process, not the other way round. You can’t sell to someone until you know how they want to buy.

When you guide your customer through all the steps you know they need to take to make the purchase, you know they’re ready to buy.

Why not use this as your closing question: ‘Are You Ready to Buy?’ They can only say yes or versions of no. If no, you have more to do to get them to be ready.

A lot of people don’t like selling. They avoid careers in sales. They love community and people and conversation, but something doesn’t feel right  to them about selling.

Even some people in selling don’t like selling. By which I mean they don’t like the bit at the end of selling.

The bit at the end is asking for the order. It should be the easiest part of the process. You’ve done all the work after all.

‘OK, if I’ve covered all your questions, and you’re happy, can we proceed with your order?’ This goes two ways:

– ‘Yes, I think we’re good to go.’ Job done, pretty much.

– ‘Erm, no, I don’t think so, not yet.’ To which you follow with. OK, no problem. What is outstanding before we can move forward?’ And so on. Until you get the deal, or you lose it through being outsold, or there never was a deal – in which case you didn’t qualify properly – or you never should have been in the deal to start with  – in which you didn’t qualify properly, or it’s a tender, which is a different kettle of fish altogether.

Asking for the order is a part of the process you come to hate if you haven’t done your job well enough.

I used to work for a guy who had his own family-owned and -run design and print business. He loved asking for the order and he was good at it. He used to joke: ‘OK so we’re ready to go at £9K? Great, I’ll put the order through for £10K, and we’ll invoice you for £11K.’ Lovely stuff.

When you’re looking to improve what you do, the temptation is to go for far-reaching change, massive innovation, that kind of thing.

It’s far better in the long run to look for the small efficiencies, and to look for them all the time.

When you visit the R&D facilities of a Formula 1 racing team, you see people striving to shave thousands of seconds off racing times with the most miniscule adjustment to things like aerodynamics. A few thousandths of a second is a few metres at top speed. A bunch of a few thousandths of a second is a commanding advantage.

Compare the touch-typing keyboardist with the one who has learned their own way, maybe using half their available digits and crossing hands across the workspace as they type. Imagine over a working life the enormous time savings formed from the collection of a vast number of infinitesimally smaller micro-movements by typing properly. Could you retire a year earlier if you were more productive over a 3-decade career in front of a computer, in a business where your productivity correlated to your profitability? Probably.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t look to change the game, out-think the competition, or disrupt the business model. Not at all. But you need to do it against a background of continuous improvement. The little things add up to much more than constantly battling the big things.

People you sell to have long since grown tired of your marketing stuff. The adage ‘self-praise is no praise’ comes to mind. Maybe that’s why we’re told as kids not to blow our own trumpet. Graciousness in defeat, humility in victory.

When faced with a problem, the first thing people will do is ask their peers. Have you faced this before? How did you deal with it? Who should we be talking to? Have you used these guys before? Were they worth it? In the networked economy, review portals and social media make this very easy.

When people can’t get they want from their peers, then they seek out the views of other customers. There are various degrees of customer advocacy, from the verbal mentioning of a client, through the use of their logo, a quote, a success story, to a detailed case study and finally the reference site, the customer who will take calls and site visits on your behalf. The greater the degree of advocacy, the harder you have to work to get them. The bigger the company, the more drawn out the process. It’s hard work getting the blue chip reference client, but it’s also worth the hard work.

When you’re preparing a press release about a customer win, or drafting a customer success story of some degree, I advise you to interview the client if at all possible. Sure, you know your key messaging, but it sounds so much better framed in the words of the people who use and benefit from your solution.

Furthermore, do as much of the write-up in the first person, using the voice of the customer to tell the story. It’s more powerful, credible and respectful that way. And, your customer can use it for their own marketing too. You’d be surprised how many see the personal and corporate benefits of being a happy customer.

Oh, and make sure you get the customer to sign off on the words too. Then as long as you don’t change the words you can recycle them at will. They are the gift that keeps on giving.