I’m putting together a series of blog posts covering what I consider to be the main B2B marketing banana skins best avoided, largely culled from my own experience and which I failed to avoid myself.

B2B marketing banana skin no 5 to avoid slipping on is this: failing to follow the purchasing process properly.

I know, it sounds obvious, but if you’re new to a role, you’re keen to get some projects rolling and stamp your authority on things, it might even be your own budget, and your own P&L…you still need to follow the purchasing process.

I’ve fallen foul of this by assuming wrongly that I could spend my budget as I saw fit. Sometimes you need to get 3 or more quotes, sometimes you need to raise a purchase order, sometimes the finance director needs to sanction all expenditure even though it’s coming from your pot. If you commission work without going through the proper channels, your FD will be slow to pay the invoice and your suppliers will not be best pleased. Worse still, they may not release the funds at all, and then your ability to commit to work and sign contracts will be called into question.

Sometimes you get lucky and your best suppliers are smart enough to ask you exactly how your purchase process works. Then you can find out from the right people and follow it.

Better still, check first before you commit to anything :-).

Having made my share of B2B marketing mistakes, I’m exploring some of the banana skins you should avoid in your own B2B marketing role.

B2B marketing banana skin no 4 to avoid is this: don’t get too bound up strategising when you also need to be executing.

It’s only natural that if you’re new to a role you want to take a step back, take stock and figure out where to go from here. This is a sensible approach, but it must be done in tandem with the ongoing running of your business.

In one of my first management roles I was hired to effect a change in strategy. I introduced a strategic review of the business, sucking in the sales force as well as the marketing team, to make sure we had done our homework, were properly aligned and were putting down the right roots to grow our new strategy.

A month later, what did we have to show for our efforts? Well, a month of no sales because the business has turned in on itself and was not actively marketing and selling. We had become preoccupied on strategy and had forgotten to keep executing.

If you don’t keep the ‘old’ stuff going at the same time as you figure out the new stuff, you won’t be able to effect the right transition. Today’s sales provide the ammunition with which to change your approach and execute tomorrow’s plan. If you delay too long, you might not have a business left when you look up from behind the parapet.

Nothing happens if someone doesn’t sell something, so keep selling even while you change direction.

I’m sharing a series of banana skins to avoid in the world of B2B marketing, in the hope that you won’t slip on them as I did, and many before me.

B2B marketing banana skin no 3 to avoid is this: don’t think you’ll perfectly crack data quality. Data quality is always flawed, because of the human element. Once you rely on people to enter data or amass information, you’re prey to fallibility and competing priorities.

When it comes to buying data for marketing purposes, or getting your sales people to correctly enter data into the system, or interrogating the data you have to get something useful out of it for decision-making, you’re onto a loser from the word go. Even if you’re using automation to amass and update your data, at some point in the chain of events you’ll have effectively paid people not a huge amount of money to get through the quantity and not focus on the quality. Too much focus on quality over a smaller amount of data makes it unprofitable for them and unaffordable for you.

Instead, realise that a certain percentage of data accuracy is all you can ever aim for, and try to put in place processes and incentives so that those who benefit from good data can see what’s in it for them if they make reasonable efforts.

As I mentioned in my previous post – although these posts are not sequential so you don’t need to read a previous post for homework like some of my other blogging series – I’m putting together a series of B2B marketing banana skins to avoid which will hopefully help you short-cut progress in your career and get to where you want to be quicker than I did.

My B2B marketing banana skin no 2 to avoid is this: don’t think you’ll get all the information you need from your CRM system. This may sound slightly controversial, since there is a wealth of excellent CRM – customer relationship management – systems out there that you can customise for your own specific purposes.

You’ll get a lot of the information you need, but not all. This is because it’s incredibly hard to design a brief for how you want your CRM system to behave before you start using it, especially if your business is in a relatively fast-moving industry. Once you start using it, you’ll realise things that you hadn’t thought of and you’ll want to make changes, which is hard to do once it’s been implemented. It’s one of the unspoken catch-22 rules of CRM systems. You’re always playing catch-up. The reports you create and the forecasting you do are rarely exactly what you’re looking for.

We live in a world of precious resources and if your business spends an unreasonably indulgent amount of time trying to perfect your CRM, you’ll become uncompetitive.

Focus on the few key aspects of your system that will govern the largest part of your success. The other aspects are nice-to-haves, which is to say they’re won’t-ever-haves.

I’ve been working in business to business – aka B2B – marketing for a long time. This means I’ve made a lot of mistakes and slipped on a lot of banana skins, an awful lot of them. Far too many to devote a post to every single one of them, I’m afraid. I thought it worthwhile, however, to share a few of them over the next few weeks.

So here’s my B2B marketing banana skin no 1 to avoid. It’s this: thinking the research is going to give you answers.

You have to do the research into your market of course. You can’t base many decisions without information. My point here is the research you do for your business is never enough, and it’s never exactly the right information.

I’ve worked in several businesses and in each case we’ve sought to get certain information to help us form our strategy. You simply can’t get the information you need, sliced in the way you want it. Even the information experts, the ones who do nothing else for a living, can’t give you exactly what you need. If you could get it, you’ve probably missed the market.

Avoid the B2B marketing banana skin of thinking you’ll get a perfect market picture. You’ll get some of it, and you’ll have to make assumptions and do qualified guesswork on the rest. Study the information you have and make your best play. Don’t wait for something perfect to come along. It won’t. Pick a point and go.

It’s hardly the most profound thing in my blogging history when I say that a lot of money can be won or lost in the zero sum game of currency exchange.

Not just in the business world, where some astute planning, hedging and plain old organisational skills can mean a major bottom line difference.

It can be equally important in an individual sense as well, but it seems to me that with every transaction the loser is always the individual, who always seems to get the thin end of the currency wedge.

The only time I had to move a significant sum of money between currencies was when I sold an apartment for a modest low-five-figure profit. I had to work really hard with the receiving bank to get a dealer rate, which made quite a big difference to the rate I was originally offered.

If you have money to start with, this can become less of a problem and you have much more control in the negotiation. I knew a chap who took advantage of very good exchange rates to buy all the US dollars he needed for living expenses over a two-year degree course over there. He had the money to do that. Few do.

In other every-day transactions, like making electronic purchases with a euro card in the UK, you’re taking a hit every single time. There’s an inter-bank rate, then there are the rates applied when the bank or payment authority either buys from you or sells to you. These can vary prodigiously from the inter-bank rate. This is, of course, where the bank makes its money, but it’s hard not to feel like a hostage in the whole process.

Ecommerce companies like Amazon make a fortune this way, as do the airlines on their in-flight rates.

This seems to be one of the few areas remaining where the consumer finds it hard to exert power in the relationship. You’re starting to see more and more currency transfer websites offering much lower fees than bricks-and-mortar banks to change money, which is great. But you’re still a hostage to the rate they offer you.

One of my favourite thee-letter acronyms – TLAs – is WFH. As in working from home.

I work from home quite a bit. It’s best for thinking, creating, writing, solving. Zero disruptions.

Zero commute too.

Theoretically I could get out of bed, walk downstairs to my office and start working immediately, especially if I’m not meeting anyone or having any video calls. Zero commute, zero dead time, zero waste.

Contrast this with when I’m working from my customers’ offices. Then I have to meet people so I can’t really turn up in my home civvies. It’s approximately 2 hours between getting up and getting in. That’s the normal prep time plus commuting time of an hour plus to get into central London. 2 hours where I can’t be productive, can’t get anything done. I can’t even read or do emails if it’s a jam-packed carriage.

So my customer, or your customer and your employer, gets much more out of us when we’re working from home. Of course you need office time to catch up on projects, touch base with your team and make sure you’re aligned on complicated jobs. That’s when I schedule my meetings and don’t try to do much of the thinking, creating, solving and writing stuff. There are too many disruptions so it’s a different kind of working day.

And that, for me, is the right work-life balance. I’ve always tried to live close to where I work to avoid the long commutes. Anything under 20minutes door to door is great. Living and working space under the same roof – as long as you’re good and switching off between them, well that’s awesome. And the zero commute means you can maximise your personal productivity and minimise your dead time.

Central London seethes during rush hour. The underground is maxed, the trains are wedged, the roads are swollen and the footpaths force pedestrians to bunch together against their will.

When the rain comes, however, the dynamic on the footpaths changes.

Up come the umbrellas. It becomes an occupational hazard waling around without one, as you risk losing an eye to the end of a scything spoke every few paces.

More than anything, though, rain in London allows people to reclaim their personal space. Their umbrellas effectively double the space around them as they jostle for space with other umbrella-wielding walkers.

And there’s nothing a Londoner likes more than their personal space as they do their A to B thing.

Clear language is so, so important, both in the written and spoken word. We have to make ourselves understood of course, so the easier we make it for our audience, the better it is for both parties.

I travel quite a bit on trains in the south of England. The train companies announce the service, the places where it calls, and for the busy commuters how many carriages there are. More carriages, more comfortable travel, at least in theory.

‘This train is formed of 8 carriages.’ Why oh why do they phrase it that way? They’re using the spoken word. When have you ever uttered ‘something is formed of 8 somethings’ in conversation? You would never say that. You would say ‘this train’s got 8 carriages.’

I’ve gone on about the unnecessary use of the passive voice before.  What’s wrong with saying ‘This train has 8 carriages?’

Clear language shouldn’t be difficult. It should be easy. We make it difficult, and in so doing make it difficult for everyone.

I was staying at my Mum’s the other day and she was complaining about her rather flaky digital TV service. She maintains a pathological avoidance of all things Murdochian, so has never embraced the world of Sky. For her broadband and TV, therefore, she’s opted for Virgin Interactive.

The broadband seems to be very reliable. I’m round at hers and it always seems extremely reliable. Less so the TV, however. The Virgin Interactive isn’t very interactive. It’s rather interinactive.

The system navigation is crude and clumsy. The operating system is slow to the point of Windowsian. The catch up and on demand functions fail regularly, and don’t get fixed by a restart of both the television and the Virgin unit. When you call customer service at unsociable hours you get an automated service advising you to un-plug and restart…

The remote is hard to fathom and clunky, meaning you mis-navigate frequently. I couldn’t get it to work and I’m relatively tech savvy. My Mum of a generation further removed from tech savviness, so for her the usability is key and the frustration palpable.

This is rather unsatisfactory and disappointing for a company that prides – and prices – itself on customer service and is headed up by one of the world’s most respected and inspirational entrepreneurs.

When you boil everything down to the lowest common denominator, stuff has to work and be simple to operate. And when there are no or few viable alternatives, the incumbents can afford to be lazy and take liberties with the consumer.