I’m all for brevity in chat conversation. It’s the one area where it’s OK to use jargon as a shortcut, and if you can abbreviate or use initials, then so much the better.

I’m all for humility too. We should all try to remain humble and avoid getting too big for our boots. Hubris and arrogance are at best an annoyance, and at worst, well, they’re pretty offensive.

When someone asks me my opinion on something, however, and it’s a subject I’ve got a lot of experience in, I’m sometimes loathe to write IMHO – in my humble opinion. I think we should be able to write IMKO – in my knowledgeable opinion.

I think you can still be knowledgeable with humility, you don’t have to lord your experience over people. After all, they’ve deferred to you for a view.

Positioning your opinion as humble, on the other hand, lessens its importance, making it feel less authoritative.

So I prefer to use IMO on its own when I’m asked my opinion on something I know something about. But I still like IMKO.

 

Many people are drawn to a charitable concern or cause because they are personally affected by it, or they know someone who is. Obviously there are degrees of interest and commitment, from following a cause on Facebook to actively campaigning and fund-raising for it.

People sometimes, sadly, are responding to a tragedy within the circle of friends or family – often in an area that they had no knowledge of or interest in – and can go on a crusade, putting all of their efforts into helping lessen the burden of others who fall victim to same poor hand of cards that they’ve been dealt. This might involve setting up a fund or a charitable cause in the name of the person affected, or it could be contributing to a cause or body that already exists. It is as a direct reaction to the events that people get involved, when they come face to face with the perspective of others who have had to endure the same fate.

This is, of course, laudable, super worthy and to be applauded. I’m not trying to denigrate the intent and the effort in any way. They are personally invested in the cause. Would they have got involved if someone they knew wasn’t affected by this condition or set of events? Probably not, but it doesn’t matter. They’re involved now.

Then there is what I call the genuinely charitable soul. The genuinely charitable soul volunteers on a regular basis and devotes their time into something that is unrelated to their own catalogue of personal experiences. They work for a cause they believe in because they feel it is worthwhile, not because of something that happened to them. They see an area where the playing field isn’t level, and they work to level it.

In this case it’s somewhat similar, though not the same as that of people who work in – ie are paid do deliver – the caring professions. To me the genuinely charitable soul is an extremely rare breed, and one to be cherished.

As a business term, the network effect is an interesting one, explaining that the more people are on a network, the more valuable the network is itself, due to strength in numbers and the critical mass to make it work.

This explains, I think, the value of webs like LinkedIn. If there were a few people in it, as opposed to a few million, it would service virtually no purpose other than that of a small, private, dwindling club..

The network effect means a slightly different thing to me. For me it symbolises the power of who you know over what you know. If you’re looking for a job, or a new contract, or a supplier of some kind, your network is your first point of call. ‘Who do you know who’s looking for or can provide ABC?’ If they can’t help you directly, they might know of someone in their network who can, or they can put out feelers into other networks, rippling out your original request in ever farther – though ever diluting – waves. Added to that, when you look for a new role or contract, knowing someone in the company, especially if they’re recommending you and they have a high perceived value in the company, gives you an almighty leg up on the competition.

It seems to me that my version of the network effect – who you know, not what you know – is still very much in effect, repetition intended. I think it hinges on comfort and trust. It takes some of the guesswork out of finding a new person, short-cuts the process and de-risks it. I guess that’s why so many companies in competitive industries, or industries where supply of quality staff is outpaced by demand, offer finders’ fees for employees who successfully refer in a new recruit.

It’s a smart policy to keep your network up to date. Your diligence will pay you back and you’ll benefit – perhaps many times over – from the network effect.

Hello. Today marks three years of blogging at pauldilger.com. Exactly three years. To the day.

From humble beginnings on the second day of September 2013, to today’s humble ongoing efforts, I’ve been sharing my ‘musings on stuff I come into contact with’, every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, come rain or shine, work day or holiday.

This is post number 471, after 157 weeks of 3 posts a week. 471 posts is a very large book. Can I say that I’ve written my first book? I don’t think so. It’s more a collection of thoughts, rather than something that is stitched together conceptually by a broad idea and physically by a spine and covers.

I started the blogging because I enjoy writing and sharing my thoughts, and also because I thought the discipline of having to post 3 times a week would be a good habit to acquire and would keep the creative juices flowing. I wasn’t sure how long I would last. After all, anyone can start something, but it takes a certain resolve to keep it going and see it through.

Through ’til when though? When do you finish something like this? Is there a natural end? Perhaps it’s when you’ve nothing more to say. But since my guiding strapline is musings on stuff I come into contact with, every passing day brings new insights and learnings that I think are worth sharing.

I will finish blogging at some point, I have to, although I’m not sure when and have no plans to finish soon. And, when I do, the end will most likely go largely unnoticed by the world, just as the start did when I published the first post and just as the middle does, from the stats I see on my posts.

That’s hardly the point though, is it?

Here’s to the next three years of blogging. Thanks for reading :-).

We can’t stop the ageing process – well I suppose we can if we die, but for me there’s not an easy route back from that. This ageing process means that there will always be someone younger than us, always someone who to us seems really young, always someone to whom we must seem really old. Fact.

I was reminded of this ineluctable fact by a friend of mine, Mr Seamus O’Riordan, whom I caught up with on the phone recently. He was getting his eyes tested not so long ago and bemoaning the fact that it was time to embrace the world of reading glasses, the consequences of which were that people might get a reminder of his reaching a ‘certain age’, to adapt from the gloriously euphemistic French phrase.

‘Well,’ his optician rejoined, ‘I’m 65. You seem really young to me.’ A rather sobering postscript to this is that the older gentleman died a few months later.

It’s all relative. It all depends on your perspective.

So what do we do about it? Two things:

  1. Live for the moment, and
  2. Look after ourselves, so we remain young in body, young in mind, young at heart

So here’s the last post in my series on B2B marketing banana skins to avoid, learned the hard way from my career so far. There are many more than 10 of course. These are the ones that came to my mind when I conceived the series. I may return to it another time, but, for now, I think 10 things to worry about not doing is more than enough.

B2B marketing banana skin no 10 to avoid is this: thinking your product or service will get there. It won’t. Ever.

There aren’t enough resources to develop a product or service into something that you and your customers think is complete. If there were it would be unaffordable and unsellable – if that’s even a word. It’s never complete. In fact it will probably never be close to complete. That’s the nature of things; there are too many competing and conflicting demands.

That’s why the golden rule of B2B marketing and sales is this – SWYG. Pronounced ‘swig’ and standing for Sell What You Got. For us marketers, it’s OK to allow for a marketing lag and promote something we don’t have yet, as long as the typical demand and sales cycle is not much longer than the time you have reasonably allowed for the new product/feature/service to be available for sale.

The word ‘reasonable’ is of course etched with uncertainty, so be careful with the claims you make, or you’ll end up with that most hated of products, the phantom.

We’re almost at the end of my series on B2B marketing banana skins that I failed to avoid and that you can sidestep – if you haven’t already. One more after this and it might be time to park the series for an unspecified period :-).

My B2B marketing banana skin no 9 to avoid is this: don’t think that you have the perfect marketing team. You don’t.

How could you have? You may have what you feel is a pretty stellar assemblage of team members, each complementing each other brilliantly. But that, in my opinion, sets you on the road to complacency – yours and theirs. A truly excellent marketing team is often a fleetingly short notion. After all, these people are good, right? That means they’re often approached by other peers or companies. It also means they command a certain standard of projects that challenge them and develop them.

If they’re really good then they might be ready for a tilt at your job, or a similar job at another firm.

Always keep you ear close to your network. Always be keeping an eye on really great people to add to your team. Before you know it, you might be back-filling an empty role rather than looking to budget for an additional head.

When someone good from your team pulls you aside for a chat and says they’ve been offered a great new job, let them go. Encourage them to go. They’ve probably checked out emotionally and if they’re trying to use you for leverage with a new job or get you to improve their package and stay with you – well, they’re not as great as you thought.

You might think they’re irreplaceable, but they always are, and often with better yet people. No, never think you have the perfect team.

In 25-plus years of B2B marketing, I’ve left a few banana skins on the floor, and failed to pick them up before slipping on them myself. This is why I’m sharing a short series of banana skins so that you might see them before it’s too late – unless you already know them, in which case, you’re ahead of me.

B2B marketing banana skin no 8 to avoid is this: thinking the big deal is in before the big deal is really in. There’s no better feeling in the B2B marketing world than knowing your marketing efforts made a difference, that they hooked in a major or strategic customer. It’s almost always time for some serious mental cartwheels.

That big deal, however, is never truly ‘in’, until you’ve received the contractual paperwork. Verbal commitments mean very little. And then it still might not happen, or the implementation might be problematic, or the customer may negotiate away the marketing clauses at a higher or unseen level to you. And even then the deal may not be a crowning success, preventing you from leveraging further marketing and advocacy benefits.

The best way to deal with this is to hope for the best, plan for the worst. If you have 2 or 3 of these large deals on the hook, you’ve safety in numbers, you’ve some insurance. Always ask yourself what you would need to do to double the pipeline number, to smash it to smithereens, to bring in twice the number of marquee customers. Then that ‘sure fire’ deal becomes far less of an issue, but no less of an opportunity if it goes swimmingly.

I’m amassing a relatively short list of B2B marketing banana skins to avoid, based largely on my history of occasionally planting my heel on the floor with gay abandon, hitting the yellow stuff and ending up chest skywards. Hopefully you don’t do the same, or at least less often.

B2B marketing banana skin no 7 to skip round is this: thinking you can police your brand. You can’t; it’s not possible.

OK, so you can to a degree in the B2B world, and you should certainly put guidelines in place and make it as easy as possible for your stakeholders to toe the line and not dilute your asset.

However, all the new, good, short domain names have been gone for 15 years, so there is the distinct probability that customers will mis-pronounce your name – company or products – mis-spell your name, or mis-use your name, that’s if they don’t forget it.

Thanks to the wonders of office productivity tools, your staff and partners will adapt your brand identity for documents, signage, collateral, interfaces and so on. They’ll use the wrong colours, the wrong typeface, the wrong pointsize, the wrong spacing, and generally place it in a bunch of contexts for which it wasn’t designed or intended. They’ll not know the messaging, or adapt it to their own purposes, or not use it properly.

What can you do about this? What you’re already probably doing, which is to issue guidelines, reminders and encouragement to protect the company’s investment since consistency, culture and value is what it’s all about.

Do your best to police your brand, but don’t be a fascist about it and don’t let it disrupt your sleep. There are other, bigger fish to fry (unless you’re vegetarian).

When you’ve spent over two decades in B2B marketing, you’re bound to slip on a few banana skins along the way. You tend to be the better from it in the long run too, which is why I’m sharing a series of them with you, curated by me from a list of memorable and not-so-memorable faux pas along the way.

B2B marketing banana skin no 6 is this: don’t assume that your marketing budget is fixed. It is not. It is a fluid, movable feast subject to the fortunes of your company and likely be adjusted up or down – sometimes a few times during a financial year.

I’m generally for front-loading expenditure in a budget period. The earlier you can make the investment, the earlier you can see the rewards. Then, if you’ve very little or nothing left in Q4, hopefully you can ride the wave of the good work that’s gone before and see the returns come in before the next financial year. On the other hand, if things don’t go well in H1 you might find that rug of a big event earmarked for Q4 gets pulled from under your feet.

If you’re ahead of plan, there’s every chance you can bid for and be allocated additional funds. Also, if you can demonstrate why a market is proving harder to crack than you anticipated, the executive might go to the well some more for you.

Let’s face it, we all hope that our budgets get revised upward during the year. It’s wise to bear in mind that there’s always a chance they might get revised down too.