Archives for category: Marketing

I’m putting together a series of blog posts covering what I consider to be the main B2B marketing banana skins best avoided, largely culled from my own experience and which I failed to avoid myself.

B2B marketing banana skin no 5 to avoid slipping on is this: failing to follow the purchasing process properly.

I know, it sounds obvious, but if you’re new to a role, you’re keen to get some projects rolling and stamp your authority on things, it might even be your own budget, and your own P&L…you still need to follow the purchasing process.

I’ve fallen foul of this by assuming wrongly that I could spend my budget as I saw fit. Sometimes you need to get 3 or more quotes, sometimes you need to raise a purchase order, sometimes the finance director needs to sanction all expenditure even though it’s coming from your pot. If you commission work without going through the proper channels, your FD will be slow to pay the invoice and your suppliers will not be best pleased. Worse still, they may not release the funds at all, and then your ability to commit to work and sign contracts will be called into question.

Sometimes you get lucky and your best suppliers are smart enough to ask you exactly how your purchase process works. Then you can find out from the right people and follow it.

Better still, check first before you commit to anything :-).

I’m sharing a series of banana skins to avoid in the world of B2B marketing, in the hope that you won’t slip on them as I did, and many before me.

B2B marketing banana skin no 3 to avoid is this: don’t think you’ll perfectly crack data quality. Data quality is always flawed, because of the human element. Once you rely on people to enter data or amass information, you’re prey to fallibility and competing priorities.

When it comes to buying data for marketing purposes, or getting your sales people to correctly enter data into the system, or interrogating the data you have to get something useful out of it for decision-making, you’re onto a loser from the word go. Even if you’re using automation to amass and update your data, at some point in the chain of events you’ll have effectively paid people not a huge amount of money to get through the quantity and not focus on the quality. Too much focus on quality over a smaller amount of data makes it unprofitable for them and unaffordable for you.

Instead, realise that a certain percentage of data accuracy is all you can ever aim for, and try to put in place processes and incentives so that those who benefit from good data can see what’s in it for them if they make reasonable efforts.

As I mentioned in my previous post – although these posts are not sequential so you don’t need to read a previous post for homework like some of my other blogging series – I’m putting together a series of B2B marketing banana skins to avoid which will hopefully help you short-cut progress in your career and get to where you want to be quicker than I did.

My B2B marketing banana skin no 2 to avoid is this: don’t think you’ll get all the information you need from your CRM system. This may sound slightly controversial, since there is a wealth of excellent CRM – customer relationship management – systems out there that you can customise for your own specific purposes.

You’ll get a lot of the information you need, but not all. This is because it’s incredibly hard to design a brief for how you want your CRM system to behave before you start using it, especially if your business is in a relatively fast-moving industry. Once you start using it, you’ll realise things that you hadn’t thought of and you’ll want to make changes, which is hard to do once it’s been implemented. It’s one of the unspoken catch-22 rules of CRM systems. You’re always playing catch-up. The reports you create and the forecasting you do are rarely exactly what you’re looking for.

We live in a world of precious resources and if your business spends an unreasonably indulgent amount of time trying to perfect your CRM, you’ll become uncompetitive.

Focus on the few key aspects of your system that will govern the largest part of your success. The other aspects are nice-to-haves, which is to say they’re won’t-ever-haves.

I’ve been working in business to business – aka B2B – marketing for a long time. This means I’ve made a lot of mistakes and slipped on a lot of banana skins, an awful lot of them. Far too many to devote a post to every single one of them, I’m afraid. I thought it worthwhile, however, to share a few of them over the next few weeks.

So here’s my B2B marketing banana skin no 1 to avoid. It’s this: thinking the research is going to give you answers.

You have to do the research into your market of course. You can’t base many decisions without information. My point here is the research you do for your business is never enough, and it’s never exactly the right information.

I’ve worked in several businesses and in each case we’ve sought to get certain information to help us form our strategy. You simply can’t get the information you need, sliced in the way you want it. Even the information experts, the ones who do nothing else for a living, can’t give you exactly what you need. If you could get it, you’ve probably missed the market.

Avoid the B2B marketing banana skin of thinking you’ll get a perfect market picture. You’ll get some of it, and you’ll have to make assumptions and do qualified guesswork on the rest. Study the information you have and make your best play. Don’t wait for something perfect to come along. It won’t. Pick a point and go.

One of my favourite thee-letter acronyms – TLAs – is WFH. As in working from home.

I work from home quite a bit. It’s best for thinking, creating, writing, solving. Zero disruptions.

Zero commute too.

Theoretically I could get out of bed, walk downstairs to my office and start working immediately, especially if I’m not meeting anyone or having any video calls. Zero commute, zero dead time, zero waste.

Contrast this with when I’m working from my customers’ offices. Then I have to meet people so I can’t really turn up in my home civvies. It’s approximately 2 hours between getting up and getting in. That’s the normal prep time plus commuting time of an hour plus to get into central London. 2 hours where I can’t be productive, can’t get anything done. I can’t even read or do emails if it’s a jam-packed carriage.

So my customer, or your customer and your employer, gets much more out of us when we’re working from home. Of course you need office time to catch up on projects, touch base with your team and make sure you’re aligned on complicated jobs. That’s when I schedule my meetings and don’t try to do much of the thinking, creating, solving and writing stuff. There are too many disruptions so it’s a different kind of working day.

And that, for me, is the right work-life balance. I’ve always tried to live close to where I work to avoid the long commutes. Anything under 20minutes door to door is great. Living and working space under the same roof – as long as you’re good and switching off between them, well that’s awesome. And the zero commute means you can maximise your personal productivity and minimise your dead time.

There’s something rewarding about getting something off your desk, and onto someone else’s. There’s a palpable sense of completion, even if it’s a first draft or a small milestone in a large project. It’s an even better feeling if it’s the end of a project. You got it done!

These days, it’s not that it’s off your desk or in your out-tray. It’s usually in your sent items, not weighing down your inbox or your task list. For now it’s someone’s else’s problem. Someone else has to complete the next stage in the process.

And feeling that sense of completion is OK too. It’s often your internal customer or boss who’s requested something from you, and here you are, delivering it to them, for them to review and kick it back to you for the next stage.

After I’ve prioritised my work for the week and for each day, I allocate a certain number of hours or part-days to each job, depending on how involved it is. This allows me to hit my own deadlines and keep to realistic targets. This also means that if I’m on time with a job I can get it off my desk at the end of a morning, the end of a day, or before a break and the start of the next job.

When it’s off your desk, it’s a demarcation point, a chance to take a breather and re-set for the next piece of work. And when it’s off your desk, it’s on someone else’s :-). Speaking of which, I must click Schedule and get this post off my desk…

I was at a music concert the other day. Popular music. It was the main act of the gig and featured a band who were not stellar or globally known but have a few hits under the belt that you would recognise.

I couldn’t name any of their songs while we were driving to the gig, but when they came on you knew them, and could sing along. There were 2 or 3 thousand at the gig, most of whom, I would guess, were fans.

Like a lot of bands, they had a new album coming out and so played a lot of new stuff. Whenever they played one of their big songs, however, the reaction of the audience was immediate and immense, visceral really.

It got me thinking, saddo that I am, about B2B marketing. This connection, this way of moving people, this level of engagement in a band/brand is something that B2B marketers can only dream about. After all, when you hear your favourite song come on, from your favourite band, the song that evokes a great holiday or time in your life, a song that you named your first child after, it inspires a feeling that you’re unlikely to see replicated when you come into work on the Monday and fire up the software that you couldn’t do your job without.

Both things, work and play, are interactions on a 1:1 basis, and even though B2B is selling to a business not a consumer, you’re still selling to an individual, or more likely a collection of individuals, each with a degree of influence and power, but individuals nonetheless, with their own set of likes, dislikes, preferences, reasons for deciding one way or the other.

Perhaps it’s wrong of us as B2B marketers to even think about trying to emulate the kind of engagement that brands strive for with people when they’re out of business, away from work.

Then again, perhaps moving people as consumers and moving people in work is not so different after all.

You wouldn’t hire a marketer who was 30% efficient, would you? They don’t strike us as very efficient or effective.

Consider this though; as marketers we spend a lot of our time being creative, coming up with new ideas for a range of different things. We’re trying to stand out, to be different, and that takes effort.

We might spend some time putting together a proposal for something, only for it not to be selected by our line manager, for a host of reasons. Then it might get through the first gate and so we spend time – and sometimes money on a third party – developing the idea and finalising it for sign-off by the budget-holder. Sometimes the budget-holder might dismiss it out of hand, in which case the effort is gone. Or, they might ask for a few changes, and because they’re super-busy the revised version might languish in their inbox for a while, by which time we and they have moved onto other things. If enough time has elapsed, and we get back to it, the business has moved on and it needs extensive re-work. This is how it is working for a business of any size with lots of interconnected priorities and resources.

When I worked in an agency, we would be commissioned to come up with a campaign. We would brainstorm a bunch of ideas, work up the 3 or 4 best ideas, and present them. Only 1 idea was selected, or sometimes elements of a couple of them. You could argue that the other 75% of the effort was wasted, except that it wasn’t because it was part of the creative process that enabled us to get to the best solution.

I used to feel that when I was a marketing employee about 70% of my output did not end up being put to wealth-generating use. The other 30% was. This is the natural, organic nature of things in a business. It’s not unusual. That doesn’t mean, however, that we shouldn’t strive to improve the ratio of successful to unsuccessful output.

As a consultant, I find the efficiency rate is good bit higher, perhaps because I’m better at what I do now, and perhaps because a company is more careful with the time it spends with external suppliers, and more profligate and cavalier with its own staff’s time.

When you think about it, then, the 30% efficient marketer is a lot better than we first thought.

It’s always good to see people taking the initiative. It doesn’t happen anywhere near as often as it should. Having initiative and taking the initiative is a bit like putting ‘self-starter’ on your CV. Everyone feels it should be on there but few generally do it, at least not early in their careers.

I remember being on a train in London Paddington, about to head west, during the evening rush hour about a decade ago during the time when intercity trains were not just full, they were packed, in a Japanese commuting-style. This particular train was bound for south Wales, but stopped off at Reading, the first major stop 25 mins away and a city that was served by a train every 15 minutes or so. The train was packed, dangerously so.

Many of the travellers were heading for Reading, perhaps 40% of them in my very unscientific estimation. I happened to be standing wedged in a corner of one of the carriages when I overheard the conductor talking to a couple of colleagues. ‘I know what we can do,’ he said. Two minutes later, the conductor came onto the intercom, apologised for the schedule change and announced that the service would not be stopping at Reading.

There was a degree of huffing and puffing, the rain emptied to the point where everyone could just about get a seat, and we took off a few minutes late.

The conductor was probably not authorised to do what he did, but he got the train away, 500 passengers where able to get to their long distance destination on time, and 200 commuters to Reading were delayed 15 minutes getting home.

We need people to take the initiative and shoulder the consequences. That’s how we get stuff done.

The key to keeping your relevance and your message fresh to your target audience is to not be afraid of reinventing yourself and your company.

All the greats do it. Look at Madonna, who has undergone several transformations in a career that defies the average life span of music performers at the top of their profession.

From a corporate sense, it makes perfect sense too. If you position yourself as leaders in a certain field and you see the trends and developments in your industry moving to a new and fast-growing category that is allied to what you already do, of course you should reinvent yourself.

Certain things need to pre-exist for you to be successful. You need to have been a credible player in the previous industry. It needs to be a credible stretch from the old company to the new one. You also need to be credible in that new space. If the belief’s not there, the success won’t be either, and chances are you’ll flounder.

I used to work with a company whose boss positioned his company a certain way, and proclaimed it to be his 3rd global business. He then reinvented the company, rebranded it, and relaunched it as a new entity, with a new mission. It was also now his 4th global business. Same company, reinvented.