Many books have a beginning, a middle and an end. An introduction with an outline, a body and a conclusion. They tell a story. You start at the beginning and you work through the end to follow the narrative flow. This is true for works of fiction and non-fiction, or business books and leisure books.
Occasionally, a book is a collection of self-contained, separate topics that don’t fit into this conventional format where the narrative hangs the content together naturally. I’m coming to the end of the drafting stage of a self-help book I’m writing. It’s more than a hundred different ideas around a very broad topic, loosely arranged into 4 themes. Each idea fits into the typical length of blog post that I’ve been writing for the past few years.
The challenge – without the guiding structure of a narrative flow – is arranging and presenting the ideas in an order that works for the reader. I could present each of the themes in turn, but that might appear uneven. Or I could sprinkle all of the ideas randomly, but that might appear disjointed. Alternatively, I could go for a mixture of the two approaches, but I might not be able to build momentum to get the reader to the end.
I’ll get to the bottom of how the book will hang together, but it’s an interesting challenge.
Many years ago, when I was in college, we used to receive occasional presentations from visiting lecturers — usually business-people from the construction industry — some good, some terrible.
One such session was memorable for two reasons:
1) the guy was an odd, quirky Yorkshireman that had plenty for us noobs to take the piss out of (as you do);
2) the presentation was actually about ‘How to present without a narrative’, and the key phrase we all came away with (which we repeated for years after, mocking his workmanlike Yorkshire delivery), was:
“Tell ’em what you’re gunna tell ’em.
Tell ’em.
Tell ’em what ya told ’em.”
That, right there, is Gold.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed Andre, still a valid mantra to this day. Thanks for commenting!
LikeLike